| Home l Site Map l Contact Us |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
Working Paper 324 |
|||||||||||||
|
by Maxwell C. Mapako
Zimbabwe has a population of 11.63 million. Nearly 35% of the population is in urban areas. Therefore, a significant portion of the population (nearly 65%) resides in the rural areas. Wood is the main cooking fuel in rural areas while electricity and paraffin are the main cooking fuels in urban households. A large portion (84%) of urban households are grid-electrified while 7% of rural households are grid-electrified. Zimbabwe has had nearly 20 years experience in dissemination of renewable energy technologies (RETs). However, wide scale dissemination of RETs has not yet been achieved. This report attempts to show why many known barriers have not been addressed, and the actual and/or potential impact of rural energy and renewables on income-generating business opportunities. This analysis is undertaken based on the following three hypotheses:
Under the first hypothesis the analysis focuses on identifying components that are crucial in determining the outcome of rural energy initiatives. A list of rural energy initiatives (both RETs and non-RETs) were examined and factors that seemed to have been decisive in influencing the outcome of each initiative were isolated. The study proposes the following recommendations pertaining to the first hypothesis:
Under the second hypothesis, the analysis compared traditional versus modern energy use in rural areas. The differences in energy use intensities were considered and the relative success rates of modern energy initiatives targeting domestic and income-generating activity end uses compared. The key recommendations pertaining to the second hypothesis include:
Under the third hypothesis, the analysis focused on attempts at isolating components that were crucial to the success of past modern energy initiatives. The analysis proposed the following recommendations:
The recommendations from the study are feasible and can be implemented with minimum challenges. However, due to the prevailing economic and political conditions in Zimbabwe, recommendations that require government financial support may not be viable. Therefore those recommendations that do not require government funding are the most promising.
This paper is available on an exchange basis. If you find
it to be useful,
we encourage you to send us any relevant publications from your
organization. To request for the full paper, please fill in the
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||